[Weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation on a specialised weaning unit: a retrospective comparison of patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection]. / Entwöhnung von der Langzeitbeatmung nach ARDS auf einer spezialisierten Weaning-Einheit ­ ein retrospektiver Vergleich von Patienten mit und ohne SARS-CoV-2 Infektion.

BACKGROUND: Available data on patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation due to severe COVID-19 are sparse. Here we compare patients with ARDS related or not related to SARS-CoV-2 infection treated in a specialised weaning unit. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation associated with an ARDS admitted from the 21st November 2013 to the 23rd July 2021 to the weaning unit of the University Hospital RWTH Aachen was performed. ARDS patients with COVID-19 (cARDS) were compared to patients with ARDS not related to COVID-19 (ncARDS). RESULTS: In total, n=129 patients in prolonged need for mechanical ventilation after ARDS were treated in the weaning unit, of whom n=38 had been suffering from ARDS related to COVID-19. Both patients groups were similar in terms of demographic parameters, underlying chronic illnesses, severity of ARDS and the duration of mechanical ventilation before being admitted to the weaning unit. During ICU stay, prone positioning and therapy with systemic corticosteroids was used more frequently in cARDS patients. Furthermore, therapy with vasoconstrictors was needed more often (cARDS: 42.1% vs. ncARDS 12.1%; p=0.0003) and urinary output was lower (cARDS: 1980 ml vs. ncARDS: 2600 ml; p=0.0037) in this patient group. The clinical course of the weaning process was similar in patients with cARDS and ncARDS, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of complications and the duration of mechanical ventilation. There were n=5 deaths (13.2%) in the cARDS and n=15 deaths (16.5%) in the ncARDS group. After hospital discharge, n=4 patients required non-invasive ventilation whereas out-of-hospital invasive ventilation was only necessary in one patient (all in the ncARDS group). CONCLUSION: After having survived the acute phase, the disease prognosis of patients with severe COVID-19 is favourable and most patients can be successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation. In addition, there were only minor differences compared to patients with ARDS unrelated to COVID-19.

Broncho-alveolar lavage in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19.

As data about microbiological testing and the cellular composition of the broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) fluid in patients ventilated due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are lacking, this was investigated in a retrospective analysis (n = 58). Co-infection with pathogens was detected in 31 patients, whereas the analysis of BAL cellularity showed an increased total cell count and an alveolitis dominated by neutrophils. None of the physicians performing bronchoscopies in COVID-19 patients had serological evidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.

Six Months Follow-Up of Patients with Invasive Mechanical Ventilation due to COVID-19 Related ARDS.

Although patients who recovered from acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may have prolonged disabilities, follow-up data of those who have survived COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is still very scarce. Therefore, COVID-19-ARDS survivors requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) were followed six months after discharge. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs), 6-min walk test (6MWT) and echocardiography were performed. Quality of life (QoL), depression and anxiety were assessed using validated questionnaires. Patients were compared based on respiratory mechanics and CT-phenotype during intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Eighteen patients were included (61 ± 7 years; ICU-stay: 34 ± 16 days; IMV: 30 ± 15 days). At follow-up (197 ± 15 days after discharge), PFTs did not reveal significant limitations (VC: 92 ± 16%; FEV1: 92 ± 20%; DLco/VA: 81 ± 16%). Cardiac systolic function was normal in all patients, but 50% of them had diastolic dysfunction. 6MWT was under the lower limit of normal in only two patients. Eight patients (44%) reported tiredness, six (33%) suffered from fatigue and one patient (6%) had depression and anxiety. Surprisingly, patients with worse respiratory mechanics during IMV reported fewer symptoms and less exertional dyspnea at follow-up. In conclusion, patients with COVID-19-ARDS have the possibility to fully recover regarding pulmonary function and exercise capacity, which seems to be independent of disease severity during ICU stay.

Follow up of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Pulmonary and extrapulmonary disease sequelae.

BACKGROUND: Since December 2019 the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been burdening all health systems worldwide. However, pulmonary and extrapulmonary sequelae of COVID-19 after recovery from the acute disease are unknown. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients not requiring mechanical ventilation were included and followed 6 weeks after discharge. Body plethysmography, lung diffusion capacity (DLco), blood gas analysis (ABG), 6-min walk test (6MWT), echocardiography, and laboratory tests were performed. Quality of life (QoL), depression, and anxiety were assessed using validated questionnaires. RESULTS: 33 patients with severe disease were included. Patients were discharged without prophylactic anticoagulation. At follow-up there were no thromboembolic complications in any patient. 11 patients (33%) had dyspnea, 11 (33%) had cough, and 15 (45%) suffered from symptoms of fatigue. Pulmonary function tests including ABG did not reveal any limitations (TLC: median=94% of predicted {IQR:85-105}; VC: 93% {78-101}; FEV1: 95% {72-103}; FEV1/FVC 79% {76-85}; PaO2: 72 mmHg {67-79}; PaCO2: 38 mmHg {35-38}), except for slightly reduced DLco (77% {69-95}). There were no echocardiographic impairments. 6MWT distance was reduced in most patients without oxygen desaturation. According to standardized questionnaires, patients suffered from reduced QoL, mainly due to decreased mobility (SGRQ activity score: 54 {19-78}). There were no indicators for depression or anxiety (PHQ-9: 7 {4-11}, GAD-7: 4 {1-9}, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19, who did not require mechanical ventilation, are unlikely to develop pulmonary long-term impairments, thromboembolic complications or cardiac impairments after discharge but frequently suffer from symptoms of fatigue.